Difference between revisions of "BLAST"

From wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "This is probably the best known of all bioinformatics applications, and consequently has various different aspects to it. =mpiBLAST= This version which stopped development i...")
 
Line 24: Line 24:
 
  rm -f nr
 
  rm -f nr
  
As you can see, this uses up a good deal of temporary hard disk space. There is an alternative way by using "zcat" and a pipe, but this also names the database fragments as "stdin" whihc is very inconvenient.
+
As you can see, this uses up a good deal of temporary hard disk space. There is an alternative way by using "zcat" and a pipe, but this also names the database fragments as "stdin" which is quite inconvenient.

Revision as of 19:22, 5 February 2016

This is probably the best known of all bioinformatics applications, and consequently has various different aspects to it.

mpiBLAST

This version which stopped development in 2010, used MPI to parallelise the blast process, by splitting up the database itself and running the query on the parts in parallel, roughly speaking. During 2015, Jens Breitbart made some modifications to the code, and called it mpifast (despite the fact that the underlying executable is still called mpiblast).

Therefore the database need to be fragmented and also - as is usual in blast - formatted.

The number of fragments is two less than the number of processes to be used. So, for 64 processes, the database will need to be fragmented into 62 parts. A script for doing this is as follows:

#!/bin/bash 
#$ -cwd 
#$ -j y
#$ -S /bin/bash 
#$ -V
#$ -q all.q
module load mpifast
export BLASTDB=/shelf/public/blastntnr/mpiblast46frags
export BLASTMAT=/home/DatabasesBLAST/data
export MPIBLAST_SHARED=/shelf/public/blastntnr/mpiblast46frags
export MPIBLAST_LOCAL=/shelf/public/blastntnr/mpiblast46frags
gunzip -c /shelf/public/blastntnr/nr.gz >./nr
mpiformatdb -i nr -N 78 -t -p T
rm -f nr

As you can see, this uses up a good deal of temporary hard disk space. There is an alternative way by using "zcat" and a pipe, but this also names the database fragments as "stdin" which is quite inconvenient.